Cases 71 - 80 of 85
Sampson v. Westfall
as 7:2011cv00479
Defendant:
Captain
Petitioner:
Robert E. Sampson
Respondent:
Officer Wayne Westfall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Westfall v. Monsanto Company et al
as 3:2009cv01503
Defendant:
Monsanto Company, Monsanto Company, Monsanto Company and others
Plaintiff:
Patricia Westfall and Patricia Westfall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Westfall v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2009cv01503
Plaintiff:
Patricia Westfall
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 77 U.S.C. § 7777 Civil Shell Case Opening
Terry Thomas v. Mary Westfall
as 09-7989
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERRY THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
MARY WESTFALL, Medical Director for Correctional Medical Services, DAVID MILLER, Physician Assistant, CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES and others
Gilmore v. Correctional Medical Services, Inc., et al
as 2:2009cv01075
Plaintiff:
Boyd Gilmore
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, Inc.,, Dr. Allen, Mary Westfall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gilmore v. Correctional Medical Services, Inc., et al
as 1:2009cv00136
Plaintiff:
Boyd Gilmore
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, Inc.,, Dr. Allen, Mary Westfall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Westfall v. The State Of West Virginia et al
as 2:2009cv00103
Plaintiff:
Joseph L. Westfall
Defendant:
The State Of West Virginia, The Governor of the State of West Virginia, The Legislate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Westfall v. Astrue
as 2:2008cv00802
Plaintiff:
Randall C. Westfall
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Williams v. Myles et al
as 2:2008cv00042
Plaintiff:
Neil Williams
Defendant:
Richard Myles, Correctional Medical Services, C.M.S. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
