Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 81 - 90 of 107
NC Supported Employment v. NC Dpt. of Health & Human Srv. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-2426
Plaintiff - Appellant: NORTHERN CAROLINA SUPPORTED EMPLOYMENT, SENECA NICHOLSON and ALAN PITTS
Defendant - Appellee: NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, EDWARD DAVIS, STACY THOMPSON and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-2083
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Willie M. Godley v. NC Dept of Health et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-1728
Plaintiff - Appellant: WILLIE M. GODLEY
Defendant - Appellee: NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES and STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
West Virginia Department of He v. Kathleen Sebeliu We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-1592
Plaintiff - Appellant: WEST VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN RESOURCES, Bureau for Medical Services
Defendant - Appellee: KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, in her official capacity as Secretary, United States Department of Health and Human Resources, CHARLENE FRIZZERA, in her official capacity of Acting Administrator, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES and others
Demos v. United States of America et al
as 5:2010cv00759
Plaintiff: John Robert Demos, Jr.
Defendant: United States of America, United States Attorney General, The President of the United States and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brown v. United States Department of Health & Human Services We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2010cv00094
Plaintiff: Perry Brown, Jr.
Defendant: United States Department of Health & Human Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Notice of Removal- Foreclosure
Mary Doe v. Kathleen Sebelius
as 10-1106
Plaintiff - Appellant: MARY SCOTT DOE, a human embryo "born" in the United States (and subsequently frozen in which state of cryopreservation her life is suspended), individually and on behalf of all other frozen human embryos similarly situated, NATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR EMBRYONIC LAW (NOEL), PETER MURRAY and others
Defendant - Appellee: KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, In her official capacity as Secretary of the Department of Health & Human Services and FRANCIS S. COLLINS, In his official capacity as director of the National Institute of Health
Mary Doe v. Barack Obama We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-1104
Plaintiff - Appellant: MARY SCOTT DOE, a human embryo "born" in the United States (and subsequently frozen in which state of cryopreservation her life is presently suspended), individually an on behalf of all other frozen human embryos similarly situated, NATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR EMBRYONIC LAW (NOEL), NIGHTLIGHT CHRISTIAN ADOPTIONS and others
Defendant - Appellee: BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, in his official capacity as President of the United States, CHARLES E. JOHNSON, in his official capacity as acting secretary of the Department of Health & Human Services and RAYNARD S. KINGTON, in his official capacity as acting director of the National Institutes of Health
State of West Virginia v. HHS
as 09-2327
Plaintiff - Appellee: STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, DARRELL V. MCGRAW, JR., Attorney General and ROBERT W. FERGUSON, JR., Cabinet Secretary of the West Virginia Department of Administration
Defendant - Appellant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES and KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services
State of West Virginia v. HHS
as 09-2261
Plaintiff - Appellant: STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, DARRELL V. MCGRAW, JR., Attorney General and ROBERT W. FERGUSON, JR., Cabinet Secretary of the West Virginia Department of Administration
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES and KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?