Cases 81 - 90 of 216
George Delaney v. Brandon Mullen
as 17-7178
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE FREDERICK DELANEY
Defendant - Appellee:
BRANDON MULLEN, Sheriff Deputy, sued individually and in his official capacity, JACOB T. MCNAMARA, Sheriff Deputy, sued individually and in his official capacity, KENNETH WILLIAM STOLLE, Sheriff, sued individually and in his official capacity and others
Stoll et al v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 1:2017cv02402
Plaintiff:
Sherry Stoll and Carmen Roundtree
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Laguer v. Stolle et al
as 2:2017cv00436
Plaintiff:
Juan C. Velez Laguer
Defendant:
Ken Stolle and Vincent Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miley v. Stolle, et al
as 2:2017cv00420
Petitioner:
Kassiem Miley
Defendant:
Sheriff Stolle, Sgt Midgette, Lt Bart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDole, Jr. v. Morgan et al
as 1:2017cv00885
Plaintiff:
Clifford McDole, Jr.
Defendant:
Gabriel Morgan, Ken Stolle and Deputy Banks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Delaney v. Jamaldeen et al
as 1:2017cv00767
Plaintiff:
George Frederick Delaney
Defendant:
Dr. Abdul H. Jamaldeen, Kenneth Stolle and Marie Kunton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Delaney v. Doe #1 et al
as 1:2017cv00780
Plaintiff:
George Frederick Delaney
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe #1, Cynthia M. Schnurbusch, T.Y. Agnew and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Delaney v. Mullen et al
as 1:2017cv00779
Plaintiff:
George Frederick Delaney
Defendant:
Brandon Mullen, Jacob T. McNamara, Kenneth Stolle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeman v. Virginia Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2017cv00330
Plaintiff:
John Louis Freeman, Sr.
Defendant:
Virginia Department of Corrections, Harold W. Clarke, Kenneth W. Stolle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Hopkins v. Stolle et al
as 3:2017cv00246
Plaintiff:
Isaiah Hopkins
Defendant:
Ken Stolle, L. Jones, Z. Diggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
