Cases 81 - 89 of 89
Pannell v. Proctor et al
as 2:2011cv00062
Plaintiff:
Richard L. Pannell
Defendant:
Dr. David Proctor, Tristen Tenny and Wexford Medical Sources Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jonathan Ojeda v. Dr. Procter
as 11-6801
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN OJEDA
Defendant - Appellee:
DR. PROCTER, sued individually and as an Agent of Wexford Medical Sources, TRISTEN TENNY, sued individually and as Agent of Wexford Medical Resources, ADRIAN HOKE, sued individually and in his Official Capacity and others
Ojeda v. Procter et al
as 2:2010cv00126
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Ojeda
Defendant:
Dr. Procter, Tristen Tenny, Adrian Hoke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Terry Thomas v. Mary Westfall
as 09-7989
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERRY THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
MARY WESTFALL, Medical Director for Correctional Medical Services, DAVID MILLER, Physician Assistant, CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES and others
Persinger v. Roberts et al
as 2:2009cv00825
Plaintiff:
Roger Persinger
Defendant:
Naomi Roberts, Doctor Subosh, Doctor Gajendragakar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wagner v. Wexford Medical et al
as 2:2009cv00028
Plaintiff:
Jack Ray Wagner, Jr.
Defendant:
Wexford Medical, Tristen Tenney, David Proctor and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Mikels v. D.O.C. Huttensville - Treasa Waid et al
as 5:2009cv00009
Plaintiff:
Henry R. Mikels
Defendant:
D.O.C. Huttensville - Treasa Waid, Wexford Medical and Doctor Proctor
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Arnold De Armond v. Chesapeake City Jail
as 08-8189
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARNOLD DE ARMOND
Defendant - Appellee:
CHESAPEAKE CITY JAIL, CAPTAIN EVANS, Jail Commander, WEXFORD MEDICAL SERVICES, INC. and others
De Armond v. Chesapeake City jail et al
as 2:2008cv00424
Plaintiff:
Arnold De Armond
Defendant:
Chesapeake City Jail, Captain Shipley, Captain Evans and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
