Cases 81 - 90 of 565,781
Deramus v. Lee et al
as 5:2024ct03127
Plaintiff:
Willie Darnell Deramus
Defendant:
J. Nuna Lee, Sgt. B. Overton, Lt. Spruill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Steen v. Sonoco Products Company et al
as 4:2024cv03105
Plaintiff:
Daniel Steen
Defendant:
Sonoco Products Company, Board of Directors of Sonoco Products Company, The, Employee Benefits Committee of the Sonoco Retirement & Savings Plan, The and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
Hancock v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 0:2024cv03108
Plaintiff:
James Evan Hancock
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Social Security Administrative Record and US Attorney - Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Howard v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 5:2024cv03102
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bryant Howard
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Social Security Administrative Record and US Attorney - Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Celltrion, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Defendant:
Celltrion, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
US v. Markus McCormick
as 24-4275
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MARKUS ODON MCCORMICK
US v. Shanena McCall
as 24-4276
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
SHANENA INEZ MCCALL, a/k/a Chubbs
US v. Maurice Shackleford
as 24-6478
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MAURICE D. SHACKLEFORD
US v. Troyvon Carroll
as 24-6481
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
TROYVON DEVONTAE CARROLL
US v. Luis Arroyo-Jimenez
as 24-6482
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
LUIS ENRRIQUE ARROYO-JIMENEZ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
