Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Meyers v. Jenkins et al
as 5:2023cv00201
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Amy Jenkins, R. Honeycutt, Jeffrey P. Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Ishee et al
as 5:2023cv00189
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Todd Ishee, Peter Buchholtz, Brandeshawn Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Honeycutt et al
as 5:2023cv00184
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
R. Honeycutt, Amy Jenkins, Daniel Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Wagner et al
as 5:2023cv00131
Plaintiff:
Maurice Johnson
Defendant:
FNU Wagner, FNU Smith, FNU Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Marshall et al
as 5:2023cv00080
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
FNU Marshall, FNU Cox, FNU LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hardin v. Roach et al
as 3:2023cv00137
Plaintiff:
Charlie L Hardin
Defendant:
FNU Roach, FNU Albright, FNU Crowe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Cooper et al
as 5:2022ct03416
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Harris
Defendant:
FNU Cooper, FNU Gardner, FNU Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
GRAVES v. DURHAM COUNTY et al
as 1:2019cv00316
Defendant:
DURHAM COUNTY, DURHAM COUNTY SHERIFF, TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA and others
Plaintiff:
Julia Graves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Kenyon et al v. Branch et al
as 1:2017cv00351
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Celeste Kenyon and Tammy McAbee
Defendant:
Jimmy Lee Branch, FNU Jackson, North Carolina Department of Public Safety and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Gill v. Clarke et al
as 3:2017cv00792
Plaintiff:
Anthony G. Gill
Defendant:
R. Clarke, R. A. Everette, A. Ellison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
