Cases 1 - 10 of 234
WOODBERRY v. MICHAEL et al
as 1:2024cv00231
Plaintiff:
MANDRAIL JAMAR WOODBERRY
Defendant:
JUDGE MICHAEL, JOHN BANDLE, M. ODOM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Saunier v. Odom et al
as 2:2024cv01229
Plaintiff:
Kathy Saunier
Defendant:
Alexus Odom, Doordash, Inc., Assurant Insurance Agency, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
WOODBERRY v. MICHAEL et al
as 1:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
MANDRAIL JAMAR WOODBERRY
Defendant:
JUDGE MICHAEL, ADA JOHN BANDLE, M. ODOM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Odom v. USA
as 5:2023cv00746
Petitioner:
Nykeem Tayquan Odom
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Odom v. State of South Carolina
as 8:2023cv06895
Petitioner:
Maurice Anthony Odom and Maurice Anthony Odom, Sr
Respondent:
State of South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
White Oak Commercial Finance LLC v. Odom
as 8:2023cv03277
Plaintiff:
White Oak Commercial Finance LLC
Defendant:
Raymond Odom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
WheelsOnsite USA, Inc. v. Odom et al
as 3:2023cv05475
Plaintiff:
WheelsOnsite USA, Inc.
Defendant:
Jamie Lance Odom and Elite Wheel Repair LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1831 Defend Trade Secrets Act
Bryant v. Warden of Tallahatchie County Correctional Facility
as 5:2023cv05088
Petitioner:
Odom Bryant
Respondent:
South Carolina Department of Corr and Warden of Tallahatchie County Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Palmer et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv04823
Plaintiff:
Walter Palmer, Scott Moonen, James Mooney and others
Petitioner:
Guy Petersen
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
