Cases 1 - 10 of 645
Watkins v. O'Malley
as 8:2024cv02124
Plaintiff:
Candace Watkins
Interested Party:
Ssaogcomms SSA Notify
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Watkins v. Ray
as 3:2024cv00118
Respondent:
H.L. Ray
Petitioner:
Phillip Watkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Adams v. Bethel Commandment Church of The Living God of New Jersey et al
as 1:2024cv02506
Defendant:
Kallaad Watkins Cepada, Clyde Watkins, Coast of Judea, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
William Adams, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2254 Civil Forfeiture - Exploitation of Children
Watkins v. State of Maryland et al
as 1:2024cv02410
Defendant:
Martin, Ogwanabi, Laiser and others
Plaintiff:
Elia T. Watkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Chapman v. Lewis et al
as 1:2024cv01485
Plaintiff:
Saquon T. Chapman
Defendant:
Watkins and Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02030
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 1158 Immigration & Nationality Act, Section 208 (Asylum)
TUCKER v. HARRIS et al
as 5:2024cv00437
Defendant:
ALETHEA HARRIS, NIKKI WATKINS, Mark Harris and others
Plaintiff:
READERLYN CARTER TUCKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Clarke et al
as 2:2024cv00479
Plaintiff:
Timothy R. Smith
Defendant:
T. Watkins and C. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chapman v. Lewis et al
as 7:2024cv00497
Defendant:
C/O Watkins and Sgt. Lewis
Plaintiff:
Saquon T. Chapman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jonathan Newell v. Ja'barri Davis
as 24-6553
Defendant:
A. SINGLETON, Correctional Officer, KIMBERLY HARRIS, Unit Manager of Granville Dorm, JA'BARRI DAVIS, Correctional Officer and others
Plaintiff:
ANTOINE JERROD WATKINS, JONATHAN JAMES NEWELL and ROY G. DAVIDSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
