Cases 1 - 10 of 18
AMERSON v. ISHEE et al
as 1:2023cv00579
Petitioner:
PIERRE ALEXANDER AMERSON
Respondent:
TODD E. ISHEE and TIMOTHY D. MOOSE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
South Carolina Department of Social Services v. Godbold-Williams et al
as 4:2023cv03258
Plaintiff:
South Carolina Department of Social Services
Defendant:
Taylor Godbold-Williams and Nancy Amerson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Evans v. Armstead et al
as 1:2021cv00603
Defendant:
Tameka Amerson, Warden Laura Armstead, Chief of Security Winnie Mott and others
Plaintiff:
Justin Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Amerson v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2020cv04407
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Dynax Corporation, Chemours Company, The and others
Plaintiff:
Phillip Amerson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Derrick v. Jennings
as 8:2020cv02819
Defendant:
John Franklin Jennings
Plaintiff:
Hayden Amerson Derrick
Not Classified By Court:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Amerson v. YRC, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00621
Plaintiff:
James Amerson
Defendant:
YRC, Inc. and Donald Wagoner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Dunn et al
as 5:2016ct03034
Plaintiff:
Chris A. Jones
Defendant:
C/O Dunn, Ms Hildton, King Berry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Dun et al
as 5:2016ct03003
Plaintiff:
Chris A. Jones
Defendant:
Sgt Dun, Ms Hildton, King Berry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AMERSON v. COVINGTON
as 1:2015cv00440
Plaintiff:
ROBERT EUGENE AMERSON, JR.
Defendant:
MARY COVINGTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Amerson et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv04294
Plaintiff:
Carol E. Amerson and Jerry L. Amerson
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
