Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Allen v. Whitley
as 5:2023cv00123
Petitioner:
Joshua Anthony Allen
Respondent:
FNU Whitley
Interested Party:
USA2255Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Allen v. Pregel et al
as 6:2020cv03385
Defendant:
James R Pregel, Jr, Quincy Whitner, Christopher Pletcher and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv07857
Plaintiff:
Theresa Allen and Anthony Allen
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
US v. Christopher Allen
as 15-4166
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER ANTHONY ALLEN, a/k/a Christopher Allen, a/k/a C. A. Allen, a/k/a Keith Anthony Baird, Jr., a/k/a Keith Roy Pemberton, a/k/a Marion Theordore Swaby, a/k/a Jose Luis Ventura
Allen v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv01149
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Allen
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Allen v. McFadden
as 8:2014cv03661
Petitioner:
Michael Anthony Allen
Respondent:
Joseph L McFadden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Allen et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv21629
Plaintiff:
Janet Allen and Anthony Allen
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Michael Anthony Allen v. Natasha Herbert et al
as 8:2014cv02098
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Allen
Defendant:
Natasha Herbert, Central Maryland Correctional Facility, Sandra Davis-Hart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
US v. Anthony Allen Pennington
as 14-4232
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ANTHONY ALLEN PENNINGTON
US v. Anthony Quinn
as 12-6004
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ANTHONY ALLEN QUINN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
