Cases 1 - 10 of 135
Santos-Bey et al v. Brown et al
as 1:2024cv01490
Petitioner:
Erick Santos-Bey and Lawrence H. Morgan
Respondent:
Anthony Brown and Carlos Bivens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carter v. Williams et al
as 7:2024cv00212
Plaintiff:
Charles Kenzell Carter
Defendant:
Williams, White, Still and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Gilbert et al
as 7:2024cv00213
Plaintiff:
Charles Kenzell Carter
Defendant:
Gilbert, Collins, Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bivens v. USA
as 5:2024cv00121
Petitioner:
Randy Lee Bivens
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Walls v. Bivens et al
as 1:2024cv00699
Plaintiff:
Jachin Boaz Walls, Sr.
Defendant:
Warden Carlos Bivens, Dr. Kyle Smith, Andrea Moss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00468
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Causion-El v. Bivens
as 1:2023cv03182
Plaintiff:
Shannon Causion-El
Defendant:
Carlos Bivens
Interested Party:
Office of the Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Bane et al v. 3M Company
as 2:2023cv04821
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Bryan Bane, Francisco Acovera, Investigator Clay Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Bivens v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01264
Plaintiff:
Colonia Bivens
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01953
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
