Cases 1 - 10 of 72
Reginald Wright v. Commonwealth of Virginia Dept. of Child Support
as 24-1321
Plaintiff:
REGINALD WRIGHT
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT, VERLITA HARRIS, individually and in her official capacity as an Operations Manager, LAURA MCVAY, individually and in her capacity as a Child Support Attorney and others
Kenneth Cooper v. Harold Clarke
as 24-6294
Petitioner:
KENNETH DWIGHT COOPER
Respondent:
HAROLD C. CLARKE, Director of Virginia Dept. of Corrections
Kenneth Newkirk v. K. Fleming
as 24-6063
Plaintiff:
KENNETH H. NEWKIRK
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT K. M. FLEMING, HAROLD C. CLARKE, Director, Dept. of Corrections, CHADWICK DOTSON, Director, Dept. of Corrections and others
Kenneth Newkirk v. Harold Clarke
as 24-6056
Plaintiff:
KENNETH H. NEWKIRK
Defendant:
HAROLD C. CLARKE, Director Department of Corrections, LISA HERNANDEZ, WARDEN RICK WHITE and others
Kenneth Newkirk v. Harold Clarke
as 24-6057
Plaintiff:
KENNETH H. NEWKIRK
Defendant:
HAROLD C. CLARKE and CHADWICK DOTSON, Director Department of Corrections
Johnson v. Clark et al
as 1:2023cv03040
Plaintiff:
Larry Ray Johnson
Defendant:
C. Clark, D. Holler, S. Hunt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Alexander Cameron v. T. Ellis, III
as 23-6645
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALEXANDER CAMERON
Defendant / Appellee:
T. S. ELLIS, III, District Court Judge, JAMES C. CLARK, Circuit Court Judge, BRYAN PORTER, Commonwealth Attorney and others
James Lutz v. Harold Clarke
as 23-6370
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES ALLEN LUTZ
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD C. CLARKE
Guan v. O'Grady et al
as 1:2023cv00405
Plaintiff:
Alice Guan
Defendant:
Liam O'Grady, James C. Clark, Jen Kim and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Guan v. Liam O'Grady, et al.
as 1:2023cv00002
Plaintiff:
Alice Guan
Defendant:
Liam O'Grady, James C. Clark, Jen Kim and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
