Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Taras Raggio v. Chris Davis
as 24-1214
Plaintiff:
TARAS N. RAGGIO, PHD
Defendant:
SHERIFF CHRIS DAVIS, Pamlico County Sheriffs Office, SHERIFF ALFRED CHIP HUGHES, Craven County Sheriffs Office, SHERIFF ENNIS WRIGHT, Cumberland County Sheriffs Office and others
Butler v. Cumberland County Sheriff's Office et al
as 5:2021ct03331
Plaintiff:
Solomon Nimrod Butler
Defendant:
Cumberland County Sheriff's Office, Ennis Wright, Tandra Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee et al v. Cumberland County Sheriff's Department
as 5:2021cv00374
Plaintiff:
Shelia Y. Lee and R.K.N.
Defendant:
Cumberland County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Butler v. Cumberland County Sheriff's Office
as 5:2021ct03208
Plaintiff:
Solomon Nimrod Butler
Defendant:
Cumberland County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Butler v. Cumberland County Sheriff's Office
as 5:2021ct03168
Plaintiff:
Solomon Nimrod Butler
Defendant:
Cumberland County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Bailey v. Stig Larson
as 17-7339
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
STIG LARSON, FAYETTEVILLE NORTH CAROLINA POLICE DEPARTMENT, UNKNOWN LT SUPERVISOR and others
Robert Gene Bailey v. Joseph Gardner
as 17-7331
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH GARDNER, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR., K. D. MACKEY and others
Robert Bailey v. K. Mackey
as 17-7326
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
K. D. MACKEY, C. C. BLAKE, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR. and others
Robert Bailey v. Stig Larson
as 17-7278
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
STIG LARSON, FAYETTEVILLE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, UNKNOWN SUPERVISOR and others
Robert Gene Bailey v. John Parsek
as 17-7281
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN PARSEK, MARION WILSON, CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE N.C. ZONING DEPARTMENT and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
