Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Santos v. Khoury et al
as 0:2024cv03381
Plaintiff:
Stephen Santos
Defendant:
Judge Coreen Khoury, Chester County Family Court, Governor Henry McMaster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moumouni v. Chester County Sheriff's Department
as 1:2024cv02167
Plaintiff:
Rose Moumouni and Rose B. Moumouni
Defendant:
Chester County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv00854
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Shugart v. Chester County
as 0:2024cv00826
Plaintiff:
William D. Shugart
Defendant:
Chester County
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Hood v. Warden of Chester County Jail
as 5:2023cv06951
Petitioner:
Decarlos Hood
Respondent:
State of South Carolina and Warden of Chester County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv06625
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Hood v. Warden of Chester County Jail
as 5:2023cv05495
Petitioner:
Decarlos Hood
Respondent:
Chester County and Warden of Chester County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Newberry v. Chester County
as 1:2023cv04772
Petitioner:
Phillip Newberry and Flip
Respondent:
Chester County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1916
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Moumouni v. Chester County School District et al
as 0:2022cv01698
Plaintiff:
Rose B. Moumouni
Defendant:
Chester County School District, Wendell Sumter, Daniel R Pfeiffer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
