Cases 1 - 7 of 7
In re: Aqueous Film-Forming Foams Products
as 24-1225
Not Yet Classified:
In re: AQUEOUS FILM-FORMING FOAMS PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
PLAINTIFFS, CITY OF BENWOOD, CITY OF BROCKTON and others
Appellant:
METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
Defendant:
THE CHEMOURS COMPANY, THE CHEMOURS COMPANY FC, LLC, E. I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS & COMPANY, now known as EIDP, Inc. and others
City of Camden et al v. E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Company et al
as 2:2023cv03230
Plaintiff:
City of Camden, City of Brockton, City of Sioux Falls and others
Defendant:
E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Company, DuPont de Nemours Inc, The Chemours Company and others
Interested Party:
State of California, State of New Hampshire, State of New York and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
City of Camden et al v. 3M Company
as 2:2023cv03147
Plaintiff:
City of Camden, City of Brockton, City of Sioux Falls and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Interested Party:
State of Colorado, State of Hawaii, State of Maine and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
City of Camden, New Jersey v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2021cv01317
Defendant:
Chemours Company FC LLC, The, 3M Company, The, DuPont de Nemours Inc and others
Plaintiff:
City of Camden, New Jersey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scott v. Camden, City of et al
as 3:2017cv00602
Plaintiff:
Blanche Scott
Defendant:
Camden, City of , John Burns , Charles Cushman, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Rufus v. Social Security
as 13-6839
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL ALONZA RUFUS
Defendant - Appellee:
SOCIAL SECURITY, City of Camden, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA and others
Clifton Anderson v. City of Camden
as 11-2215
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLIFTON ANDERSON and RICHARD STOERKEL
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF CAMDEN, South Carolina, MIKE STONE, Lieutenant, KERSHAW COUNTY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
