Cases 1 - 10 of 18
LARSON v. GACEK et al
as 1:2023cv00089
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY COBY LARSON
Defendant:
GARY GACEK and THE CITY OF CONCORD, NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
TAYARA v. LARSON et al
as 1:2022cv00633
Plaintiff:
VIRGINIA TAYARA
Defendant:
TIMOTHY COBY LARSON and CITY OF CONCORD, NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Long v. City of Concord et al
as 5:2021cv00201
Defendant:
Estate of Marshall James Lee, Estate of George Monroe Vogler Jr., Guy Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Wallace Long
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Long v. City of Concord et al
as 4:2021cv00063
Defendant:
Estate of Marshall James Lee, Estate of George Monroe Vogler Jr., Guy Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Wallace Long
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ARROYO et al v. SOUTHWOOD REALTY COMPANY et al
as 1:2021cv00219
Plaintiff:
VALERIE ARROYO and DEREK OLIVARIA
Defendant:
SOUTHWOOD REALTY COMPANY, LUZ GORDON, CITY OF CONCORD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PORTER v. BARR et al
as 1:2020cv00573
Defendant:
MARTIN B. MCGEE, KEVIN PFISTER, JAMES ROMINGER and others
Plaintiff:
DONAT CALEB PORTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
TYLER v. BARCELLONA et al
as 1:2018cv00486
Plaintiff:
MILO DANIEL TYLER
Defendant:
TOM BARCELLONA, R. B. HARKEY, SOUTHERN HEALTH PARTNERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TYLER v. BARCELLONA et al
as 1:2018cv00183
Plaintiff:
MILO DANIEL TYLER
Defendant:
TOM BARCELLONA, ANDREW P. CLEMENT, WILLIAMS W. BAGGS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00299
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
CHURCHWELL V. CITY OF CONCORD
as 1:2016cv01114
Plaintiff:
JANA CHURCHWELL
Defendant:
CITY OF CONCORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
