Cases 1 - 10 of 204
Parks v. North Carolina Child Support Services et al
as 5:2024cv00220
Plaintiff:
Antonio Cortez Parks
Defendant:
North Carolina Child Support Services and Verna Donnelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jerrell Edwards v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6318
Petitioner:
JERRELL CORTEZ EDWARDS
Respondent:
HAROLD W. CLARKE and CHADWICK DOTSON
Parks v. Raleigh Police Department
as 5:2024cv00200
Plaintiff:
Antonio Cortez Parks
Defendant:
Raleigh Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cortez v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00326
Plaintiff:
Jorge Cortez
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Cortez Lawrence v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2024cv00831
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Cortez Lawrence
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Maria Cortez Pineda v. Merrick Garland
as 23-2210
Petitioner:
MARIA SARAI CORTEZ PINEDA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Robert Cortez v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv04649
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Cortez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02004
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Davis et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv03301
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Jerel Lamar Davis, James Paul Carozza, Joseph C Carr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
US v. JeDonte Johnson
as 23-4441
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JEDONTE CORTEZ JOHNSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
