Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01078
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bowser v. CREE, Inc. et al
as 5:2022cv00134
Plaintiff:
Robert Bowser
Defendant:
CREE, Inc., The Cree, Inc. Severance Pay Guidelines and The Cree Inc. Severance Program
Counter Claimant:
The Amended and Restated Severance Program
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
CAO LIGHTING, INC. v. CREE, INC. et al
as 1:2021cv00634
Plaintiff:
CAO LIGHTING, INC.
Defendant:
CREE, INC. and IDEAL INDUSTRIES LIGHTING LLC doing business as CREE LIGHTING, A COMPANY OF IDEAL INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
CREE, INC. v. WATCHFIRE SIGNS, LLC
as 1:2020cv00198
Plaintiff:
CREE, INC.
Defendant:
WATCHFIRE SIGNS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CURRENT LIGHTING SOLUTIONS, LLC et al v. CREE, INC.
as 1:2019cv00394
Plaintiff:
CONSUMER LIGHTING (U.S.), LLC, CURRENT LIGHTING SOLUTIONS, LLC and GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
Defendant:
CREE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Benchmark Electronics, Inc v. Cree Inc.
as 19-1358
Defendant / Appellant:
CREE INC.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BENCHMARK ELECTRONICS DE MEXICO, S. DE R.L. DE C.V. and BENCHMARK ELECTRONICS, INC
OptoLum Incorporated v. Cree Incorporated
as 1:2018mc00001
Defendant:
CREE INC
Movant:
DONALD LENKSZUS
Plaintiff:
OPTOLUM INCORPORATED
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
OPTOLUM INC. v. CREE INC.
as 1:2017cv00687
Plaintiff:
OPTOLUM INCORPORATED
Defendant:
CREE INC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
UNITY OPTO TECHNOLOGY CO. LTD V. CREE INC.
as 1:2017cv00342
Plaintiff:
UNITY OPTO TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.
Defendant:
CREE INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
MIRANDA DE TREJO V. CREE, INC., ET AL.
as 1:2016cv00987
Defendant:
CREE, INC. and GREENE RESOURCES, INC.
Plaintiff:
ROSA EVELYN MIRANDA DE TREJO
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
