Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Saphilom v. Office of the Chief Medical Examiner et al
as 3:2023cv00024
Plaintiff: Keolattana Tootoo Saphilom
Defendant: Office of the Chief Medical Examiner, Arkuie Williams, Gene Xavier Maya and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Eilola v. Terry We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv11572
Petitioner: David Harold Eilola
Respondent: Ralph Terry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. Meade et al
as 2:2016cv00164
Plaintiff: David Harold Jones, II
Defendant: Barbara Meade, Dr. Mackie and Rappahannock Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. United States of America et al
as 5:2015ct03195
Plaintiff: David Harold Johnson
Defendant: United States of America and James C. Fox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: David Johnson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-1783
Petitioner: In re: DAVID HAROLD JOHNSON
:
Johnson v. United States of America
as 5:2015hc02130
Petitioner: David Harold Johnson
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Barton v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv28626
Plaintiff: David Harold Barton
Defendant: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
David Johnson v. State of North Carolina
as 14-6773
Plaintiff - Appellant: DAVID HAROLD JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and MICHAEL HICKS
Johnson v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2014ct03009
Plaintiff: David Harold Johnson
Defendant: State of North Carolina and Michael Hicks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Headen et al v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2013ct03213
Plaintiff: Christopher M. Headen, Theodore J. Williams, Adam Troy Kittrell and others
Defendant: State of North Carolina and Quentin T. Summer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?