Cases 1 - 10 of 86
Robert Smith, Jr. v. Warden of Tyger River Correctional Institution
as 24-6394
Petitioner:
ROBERT DAVIS SMITH, JR., a/k/a Robert David Smith, Jr.
Respondent:
WARDEN, TYGER RIVER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00326
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00884
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Robert Smith, Jr. v. Warden, Tyger River Correctional Institution
as 23-7289
Petitioner:
ROBERT DAVIS SMITH, JR., a/k/a Robert David Smith, Jr.
Respondent:
WARDEN, TYGER RIVER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Najacque v. Smith, et al
as 3:2023cv00657
Plaintiff:
Leonard Najacque
Defendant:
Unknown, David Smith, David W. Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. State of South Carolina
as 8:2023cv04820
Petitioner:
Robert Davis Smith, Jr and Robert David Smith, Jr.
Respondent:
State of South Carolina and Warden of Tyger River Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kathleen Borland et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv04636
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Inc, Raytheon Technologies Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Borland, James Borland, Mark Ernstrom and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv02007
Plaintiff:
Shawn David Smith
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
Ssaogcomms SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
US v. Joshua Smith
as 23-4482
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSHUA DAVID SMITH
US v. Joshua Smith
as 23-4481
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSHUA DAVID SMITH
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
