Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Killings et al v. 3M Company
as 2:2024cv00398
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Lemuel Killings, Jr, James Harper, Raymond Harrell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00274
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv03317
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Regina Johnson v. Raymond Mitchell
as 17-2348
Plaintiff - Appellant:
REGINA DENISE JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
RAYMOND MITCHELL and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
KENYETTA MCKNIGHT, MARK TURNER, IV and DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Johnson v. McKnight et al
as 3:2017cv00895
Plaintiff:
Regina Denise Johnson
Defendant:
Kenyetta McKnight, Mark A. Turner, Raymond Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv09471
Plaintiff:
Denise Johnson and Michael Johnson
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2015cv01683
Plaintiff:
Denise Johnson and Carl Johnson
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv25601
Plaintiff:
Denise Johnson
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv11777
Plaintiff:
Denise Johnson
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv09421
Plaintiff:
Denise Johnson
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
