Cases 1 - 10 of 58
Maycock v. USA-2255
as 1:2023cv01257
Petitioner:
Edward James Maycock, Jr.
Respondent:
USA-2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Shell et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00400
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Clarence Shell, Barry Kenneth Abrams, Michael Absher and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Monk et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00401
Defendant:
3M Company, Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Bobby Dean Monk, Sr, Ronald Lee Grubb, David Keith Gunter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Product Liability
Maycock v. USA - 2255
as 1:2020cv02719
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Petitioner:
Edward James Maycock, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Johnson v. USA-2255
as 1:2020cv01683
Petitioner:
Edward James Johnson
Respondent:
USA-2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
In re: James Tyer
as 19-2474
Petitioner:
In re: JAMES EDWARD TYER, a/k/a James Edward Tyler, a/k/a Tyer Edward James, a/k/a Jay
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00535
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edward Egan v. Harold Clarke
as 19-6580
Defendant:
ROANOKE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and STEVEN A. MCGRAW, Clerk
Defendant / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Petitioner / Appellant:
EDWARD JAMES EGAN, SR.
James v. J. Reuben Long Detention Center
as 1:2019cv00152
Defendant:
J. Reuben Long Detention Center, Officer Michael, Officer Jordan and others
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Edward James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. Kiser
as 7:2018cv00635
Defendant:
Jeffery B. Kiser
Plaintiff:
Joseph Edward James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
