Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Eric Grueninger v. Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
as 22-7242
Petitioner / Appellant:
ERIC ADAM GRUENINGER
Respondent / Appellee:
DIRECTOR, VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Purisima v. County of Arlington Virginia et al
as 1:2021cv01244
Plaintiff:
Anton C. Purisima
Defendant:
County of Arlington Virginia, Hudson County, New Jersey, Carlyle Council and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Eric Green v. Gary McFadden
as 21-6535
Defendant / Appellee:
MECKLENBURG COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, MICHAEL A KOLB, Attorney at Law, W. ROBERT BELL, Senior Judge and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERIC ADAM GREEN
Green v. McFadden et al
as 3:2021cv00025
Defendant:
Mecklenburg Sheriff Department, Michael A. Kolb, W. Robert Bell and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Adam Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grueninger v. Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
as 3:2015cv00169
Petitioner:
Eric Adam Grueninger
Respondent:
Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Eric Grueninger v. Director, Virginia DOC
as 14-7072
Petitioner - Appellant:
ERIC ADAM GRUENINGER
Respondent - Appellee:
DIRECTOR, VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Grueninger v. Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
as 3:2013cv00260
Petitioner:
Eric Adam Grueninger
Respondent:
Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
L v. South Carolina Department of Juvenile Justice et al
as 3:2012cv03617
Plaintiff:
A L
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Juvenile Justice , Jeffrey Carnes , Michael Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Adams v. Bausch & Lomb Inc
as 2:2009cv01114
Plaintiff:
Eric Adams, Eric Adams, Eric Adams and others
Defendant:
Bausch & Lomb Inc, Bausch & Lomb Inc, Bausch & Lomb Inc and others
Special Master:
Daniel Capra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
