Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 3,085
US v. John Johnson
as 24-6586
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: JOHN HENRY JOHNSON
Wojcik v. Medical Adm, MacDougall CI et al
as 0:2024cv03559
Plaintiff: James Allen Wojcik
Defendant: Henry, Rick, Medical Adm, MacDougall CI and Warden Martell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Andrews et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv02468
Plaintiff: Gerald E. Andrews, Mary Margaret Baker, John Franklin Bishop and others
Defendant: 3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Alston v. Beck et al
as 0:2024cv03433
Plaintiff: Londell Lashun Alston
Defendant: Judge Walton Henry Beck and County of York, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Newberry v. McMaster
as 1:2024cv03397
Plaintiff: Phillip D. Newberry
Defendant: Henry McMaster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Santos v. Khoury et al
as 0:2024cv03381
Plaintiff: Stephen Santos
Defendant: Judge Coreen Khoury, Chester County Family Court, Governor Henry McMaster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
US v. William Horne, IV
as 24-6534
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: WILLIAM HENRY HORNE, IV
Thompson v. Warden of Livesay Correctional Institution
as 1:2024cv03331
Plaintiff: James Henry Thompson, II
Defendant: The State of South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03192
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Barnes v. Henry et al
as 1:2024cv01077
Plaintiff: Robert Earl Barnes, Jr.
Defendant: J. Henry, R. Barnes, Hetz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?