Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Mamie Hansley v. Louis DeJoy
as 23-1426
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAMIE HANSLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
LOUIS DEJOY, in his official capacity as Postmaster General, U.S. Postal Service, Agency
Canady v. Hansley et al
as 5:2022cv00179
Plaintiff:
Fredrick L. Canady
Defendant:
FNU Hansley, FNU Honeycutt, Kenneth D. Poteat and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hansley v. Dejoy
as 7:2020cv00252
Plaintiff:
Mamie Hansley
Defendant:
Postmaster General Louis Dejoy and Louis Dejoy
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703
Hansley et al v. Department of Navy
as 7:2019cv00133
Defendant:
Department of Navy
Petitioner:
Delorise Hansley
Plaintiff:
James Hansley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Whitaker v. Norfolk Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2013cv01498
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey D. Whitaker
Defendant:
Norfolk Sheriff's Office, Sheriff McCabe, Lt. Col. Borom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Clark v. M. Cheeseboro
as 12-6670
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM BILL CLARK
Defendant - Appellee:
M. CHEESEBORO, Sargeant/H.R.R.J., CORRECTIONAL OFFICER SIMMONS, Corr.Officer at H.R.R.J., SGT. WARD, Sargeant at H.R.R.J. and others
Waiters v. Lee et al
as 5:2011ct03036
Plaintiff:
Quinea M. Waiters
Defendant:
C/O Lee, Ms. Dochi, Ms. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Cheeseboro et al
as 2:2011cv00097
Plaintiff:
William Bill Clark
Defendant:
M. Cheeseboro, C/O Simmons, Sgt. Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dickson v. Cherry et al
as 2:2010cv00225
Plaintiff:
John M. Dickson, Jr.
Defendant:
Roy Cherry, T. D. Hatchett, E. Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dickson v. Parker Correctional Officer et al
as 2:2010cv00134
Plaintiff:
John M. Dickson, Jr.
Defendant:
Parker, All John/Jane Does at Hampton Roads Regional Jail, Ralph Albaseau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
