Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03346
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Coffy, Sr. v. Hannon, Jr. et al
as 2:2023cv01760
Plaintiff:
Marlin Elrico Coffy, Sr.
Defendant:
Michael S. Hannon, Jr., FTO Douglas Richards, Dittrich, PFC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Coffy, Sr. v. Mount Pleasant Police Department et al
as 2:2023cv00236
Plaintiff:
Marlin Elrico Coffy, Sr.
Defendant:
Mount Pleasant Police Department, Michael S. Hannon, Jr., Kevin Dani Herbst, P.F.C and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Edmondson v. Cowen Truck Line Inc et al
as 0:2016cv03856
Plaintiff:
Alfred D Edmondson
Defendant:
Cowen Truck Line Inc and George M Herbst
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Herbst v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv16243
Plaintiff:
Audrey Herbst
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Michael Gregg-Wilson v. Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarbor
as 15-1699
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL GREGG-WILSON
Defendant - Appellee:
NELSON MULLINS RILEY & SCARBOROUGH LLP, SUE ERWIN HARPER, FOLEY & LARDNER and others
Gregg-Wilson v. Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP et al
as 3:2015cv00807
Plaintiff:
Michael Gregg-Wilson
Defendant:
Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP, Sue Erwin Harper, Foley & Lardner LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Herbst v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv26272
Plaintiff:
Joan E. Herbst
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Herbst v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv22228
Plaintiff:
Darla Herbst
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-2266
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
