Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,639
Kanautica Zayre-Brown v. North Carolina Department of Adult Corrections
as 24-6477
Plaintiff: KANAUTICA ZAYRE-BROWN
Defendant: NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ADULT CORRECTIONS, TODD E. ISHEE, in his official capacity as Secretary of the North Carolina Department of Adult Correction, GARY JUNKER, in his official capacity as Deputy Secretary of the North Carolina Department of Adult Correction and others
Maryland Chapter of the Sierra Club v. Federal Highway Adminstration
as 24-1447
Plaintiff: MARYLAND CHAPTER OF THE SIERRA CLUB, part of Sierra Club, Inc., NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN THE UNITED STATES, NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INCORPORATED and others
Defendant: FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINSTRATION, STEPHANIE POLLACK, in her capacity as Acting Administrator of the Federal Highway Administration, GREGORY MURRILL, in his official capacity as Maryland Division Administrator of the Federal Highway Administration and others
Muna al-Suyid v. Khalifa Hifter
as 24-1429
Plaintiff: MUNA AL-SUYID, individually and on behalf of the estates of her family members Abdel Salam al-Suyid, Ibrahim al-Suyid, Khalid al-Suyid and Mustafa al-Suyid, ABDALLA AL-KRSHINY, Individually and on behalf of his family member Ali al-Krshiny and Mustafa al-Krshiny, AHMAD AL-KRSHINY, Individually and on behalf of his family member Ali al-Krshiny and Mustafa al-Krshiny and others
Defendant: KHALIFA HIFTER, SADDAM HIFTER and KHALID HIFTER
Muna al-Suyid v. Khalifa Hifter
as 24-1422
Plaintiff: MUNA AL-SUYID, individually and on behalf of the estates of her family members Abdel Salam al-Suyid, Ibrahim al-Suyid, Khalid al-Suyid and Mustafa al-Suyid, ABDALLA AL-KRSHINY, Individually and on behalf of his family member Ali al-Krshiny and Mustafa al-Krshiny, AHMAD AL-KRSHINY, Individually and on behalf of his family member Ali al-Krshiny and Mustafa al-Krshiny and others
Defendant: KHALIFA HIFTER, KHALID HIFTER and SADDAM HIFTER
Kenneth Creel v. Gary Junker
as 24-6449
Plaintiff: KENNETH RAY CREEL
Defendant: GARY JUNKER, DR. ARTHUR CAMPBELL, DEBRA FITZGERALD and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00290
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination (Sex)
Saadiq Long v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1403
Plaintiff: SAADIQ LONG, a/k/a Paul Anderson, JUANGJAN DAVES and LESHAUNA DAVES
Defendant: WILLIAM BARR, Attorney General of the United States, in his official capacity only, CHRISTOPHER ASHER WRAY, Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, in his official capacity only, CHARLES H. KABLE, IV, Director of the Terrorism Screening Center, in his official capacity only and others
Lynch v. Alba et al
as 3:2024cv02857
Defendant: Jessica Alba, Jessica Aber or her Successor, Chief of Security and others
Plaintiff: John D Lynch, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robert Frazier v. Prince Georges County
as 24-1380
Plaintiff: ROBERT FRAZIER, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated persons, ANIBAL HERNANDEZ, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated persons, D.P., a minor, by and through his next friend and guardian K.P. and others
Defendant: PRINCE GEORGES COUNTY, MARYLAND, CORENNE LABBE, in her official capacity as Director of the Prince George's County Department of Corrections, JEFFREY LOGAN, in his official capacity as Division Chief of the Prince George's County Population Management Division and others
E.M., by his guardian and next friend, Madeline Grochowski et al v. Brown et al
as 7:2024cv00288
Defendant: Robin Brown, Robin Freeman and Crystal Brake
Plaintiff: E.M., by his guardian and next friend, Madeline Grochowski, K.M., by her guardian and next friend, Madeline Grochowski, H.M., by her guardian and next friend, Madeline Grochowski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?