Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Rutledge v. Wake Forest University School of Medicine et al
as 3:2024cv00404
Defendant:
William Richardson, Juilene Almond, Wake Forest University School of Medicine and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher R. Rutledge, A M R, A D R and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Waters v. Coleman et al
as 5:2023ct03205
Plaintiff:
William Charles Waters
Defendant:
Ernie Coleman, Scott Hammonds, Lt. M. Ormond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carothers v. Berryhill
as 1:2018cv00330
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn Hewitt Carothers
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Reetz v. Lowe's Companies, Inc. et al
as 5:2018cv00075
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Reetz
Defendant:
Lowe's Companies, Inc. , Administrative Committee of Lowe's Companies, Inc. , John and Jane Does and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00711
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00932
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Caraway v. City of Elizabeth City, North Carolina et al
as 2:2017cv00020
Defendant:
City of Elizabeth City, North Carolina, Jamie Lacombe and Cathy Hewitt
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lee Caraway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00237
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
ARNOLD v. ELIASON et al
as 1:2015cv00498
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS DENORRIS ARNOLD
Defendant:
RUSSELL A. ELIASON, THOMAS D. SCHROEDER, COMBS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ARNOLD v. COMBS et al
as 1:2015cv00499
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS DENORRIS ARNOLD
Defendant:
COMBS, THOMAS D. SCHROEDER, RUSSELL A. ELIASON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
