Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Bell et al v. Unknown named IRS employee author of I.R.M. 25.25.10-1 et al
as 2:2023cv00113
Plaintiff: Timothy James Bell, United States ex rel, United States of America ex rel and others
Defendant: Unknown named IRS employee author of I.R.M. 1, Neil Schoonmaker, IRS employee number 1000143350 and others
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy/Deprivation Civil Rights
In re: John Bell
as 21-296
Petitioner: In re: JOHN JAMES BELL
Mitchell v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2018cv01221
Plaintiff: Norman Mitchell
Defendant: South Carolina Department of Corrections , FNU Lee , FNU Turman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell v. Lipscomb
as 5:2018ct03067
Plaintiff: James Bell
Defendant: Paul Jackson Lipscomb, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-6068
Petitioner - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Bell v. Life Insurance Company of North America
as 6:2017cv03188
Plaintiff: James Bell
Defendant: Life Insurance Company of North America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv02176
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00267
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00169
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
In re: Omar Abdel-Al-Mumit We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-1962
Petitioner: In re: OMAR ABDEL-AL-MUMIT, a/k/a John James Bell

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?