Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Jessie Young v. John Doe Hill
as 20-1304
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JESSIE YOUNG
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN DOE HILL, JOHN DOE RODRIGUEZ and JOHN DOE BREEN, Sergeant
Messinger et al v. Rodriguez et al
as 2:2017cv02412
Plaintiff:
John A Messinger and David M Messinger
Defendant:
John C Rodriguez and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Cross_claimant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Cross_defendant:
John C Rodriguez
Counter_claimant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Counter_defendant:
David M Messinger and John A Messinger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Burwell v. Rodriguez et al
as 8:2017cv00784
Plaintiff:
Joseph M. Burwell
Defendant:
John S. Rodriguez, Allen Martina, Easy Direct Solution US LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Young v. Hill et al
as 1:2016cv01304
Plaintiff:
Jessie Young
Defendant:
John Doe Hill, John Doe Breen and John Doe Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Gino Jackson v. Eric Olsen
as 10-7044
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GINO V. JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
ERIC L. OLSEN, sued in his individual capacities that is under color of law, DANIEL M. CHICHESTER, Stafford Commonwealth Attorney, sued under the principal of respondeat superior, PHONG MICHAEL HARDIMAN, sued in his individual capacities that is under color of law and others
Defendant:
DAVID P. BAUGH, sued in his individual capacities that is under color of law, JOSEPH T. BROWN, sued in his individual capacities that is under color of law, KRISTIE L. KANE, sued in her individual capacities that is under color of law and others
The Injured Workers' Insurance Fund v. Rockland Staffing, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv01593
Plaintiff:
The Injured Workers' Insurance Fund, The Injured Workers' Insurance Fund and The Injured Workers' Insurance Fund
Defendant:
Rockland Staffing, Inc., John C. Daskalis and John E. Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
