Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Reeves v. Virginia Employment Commission
as 7:2022cv00435
Plaintiff:
Joseph Andrew Reeves
Defendant:
Virginia Employment Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Demond White v. George Schaefer, Jr.
as 21-7248
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEMOND ANTOINE WHITE
Defendant / Appellee:
GEORGE SCHAEFER, JR., III, NICOLE E. JANICKI, Detective, NPD (31043), CHRISTOPHER W. ROCCIO, Detective, NPD (29301) and others
Demond White v. Thurman Livingston
as 21-6072
Defendant / Appellee:
MARY JANE HALL, Norfolk Circuit Court Judge, THERESE C. MOYNIHAM, Forensic Scientist, PHILIP G. EVANS, II, Deputy Commonwealth's Attorney and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEMOND ANTOINE WHITE
Pack v. Cobalt Coal Corp., Mining, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00066
Defendant:
Pure Energy Coal, LLC, Cobalt Coal Corp., Mining, Inc., Westchester Coal Limited Partnership and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Andrew Pack, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hobbs v. Hayes et al
as 7:2019cv00165
Defendant:
Cpt. Josh Hayes, Cpl. Hand and Lt. Rebeca Baird
Plaintiff:
Joseph Andrew Hobbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hobbs v. Dr. Koscinski et al
as 7:2019cv00033
Defendant:
Dr. Koscinski and Dr. Large
Plaintiff:
Joseph Andrew Hobbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DANIELS v. USA
as 1:2017cv00343
Petitioner:
JOSEPH ANDREW DANIELS
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Kuhle et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv30351
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Kuhle and Joseph Andrew Kuhle, Jr.
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Westfield Insurance Company v. Bell
as 1:2014cv00194
Plaintiff:
Westfield Insurance Company
Defendant:
Joseph Andrew Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Andrews v. Astrue
as 5:2012cv00607
Plaintiff:
Joseph Andrews
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
