Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Rover Pipeline LLC v. Rover Tract No(s). WV-DO-SHC-039.000-ROW AND WV-DO-SHC-039.310-ROW et al
as 1:2018cv00099
Plaintiff:
Rover Pipeline LLC
Defendant:
Rover Tract No(s). WV-DO-SHC-039.000-ROW AND WV-DO-SHC-039.310-ROW, Audrey J. Baltoff, Frances Mae Musgrove and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Rover Pipeline LLC v. Rover Tract No(s). WV-DO-SHC-021.000-ROW et al
as 1:2018cv00104
Defendant:
Rover Tract No(s). WV-DO-SHC-021.000-ROW, Paul Amos Smith, Kay Fowler and others
Plaintiff:
Rover Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Rover Pipeline LLC v. Rover Tract No(s) WV-DO-SHB-009.972-TAR-1A et al
as 1:2017cv00016
Defendant:
Rover Tract No(s) WV-DO-SHB-009.972-TAR-1A, Agnes E. Poe, Elizabeth A. Jordan and others
Plaintiff:
Rover Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Nathan Webb v. Lynne Brawn
as 15-6332
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATHAN WEBB, a/k/a Nathaniel R. Webb
Defendant - Appellee:
LYNNE BRAWN, JAMES F. SMITH and MARK VANHOUTEN
Westfield Insurance Company v. Records Imaging & Storage, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv18854
Plaintiff:
Westfield Insurance Company
Defendant:
Records Imaging & Storage, Inc. , Camden-Clark Memorial Hospital Corporation , James F. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nathan Webb v. Lynne Brawn
as 13-6781
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATHAN WEBB
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES F. SMITH, LYNNE BRAWN and MARK VANHOUTEN
Webb v. Brawn et al
as 5:2012ct03042
Plaintiff:
Nathan Webb
Defendant:
Lynne Brawn, James F. Smith and Mark Vanhouten
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Craig Sanford v. SCG International, LLC
as 11-2394
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CRAIG SANFORD and MARY JO SANFORD
Defendant - Appellant:
SCG INTERNATIONAL, LLC and JAMES F. SMITH, JR., a/k/a Jamie Smith
Sanford et al v. SCG International, LLC et al
as 1:2010cv00940
Plaintiff:
Craig Sanford and Mary Jo Sanford
Defendant:
SCG International, LLC and James F. Smith, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
