Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Adrian Nicholson v. TitleMax of Virginia, Inc.
as 22-2007
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ADRIAN NICHOLSON, AIMEE EDWARDS, ALMA CARTER and others
Defendant / Appellant:
TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC.
Defendant:
TITLEMAX OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC. and TMX FINANCE OF VIRGINIA, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00238
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
NICHOLSON, ET AL. v. TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC. et al
as 1:2019cv00490
Defendant:
TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC., TITLEMAX OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC. and TMX FINANCE OF VIRGINIA, INC.
Plaintiff:
ADRIAN NICHOLSON, ET AL., EUELL STANFIELD, ANGELIQUE GRAY and others
Counter Defendant:
DOMINIQUE BRADLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Franklin Reaves v. Mullins Police Dept
as 11-1459
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANKLIN C. REAVES, Reverend, VASTENA REAVES, DONALD N. REAVES and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF MULLINS POLICE DEPARTMENT, MARION COUNTY, TERRY B. STRICKLAND, individually and in his official capacity as member of Mullins City Council and others
Appellee:
W. KENNETH MCDONALD, individually and in his official capacity as Mayor
Reverend Reaves v. Mullins, City of
as 10-1979
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANKLIN C. REAVES, PhD and VASTENA REAVES, All others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF MULLINS, MARION COUNTY, W. KENNETH MCDONALD, individually and in his official capacity as Mayor and others
Reaves et al v. City of Mullins et al
as 4:2008cv01818
Plaintiff:
Franklin C Reaves, Vastena Reaves, Donald N Reaves and others
Defendant:
City of Mullins, Marion County, W Kenneth McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Reaves et al v. Mullins, City of et al
as 4:2007cv03559
Plaintiff:
Franklin C Reaves and Vastena Reaves
Defendant:
Mullins, City of, Marion County, W Kenneth McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
