Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Akers et al v. County of Sampson
as 7:2022cv00043
Plaintiff:
Joshua D. Akers, Jessica Byrd, Joseph Byrd and others
Defendant:
County of Sampson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Perry v. Stowers et al
as 0:2015cv03647
Plaintiff:
David Kevin Perry
Defendant:
Marshal Stowers, Ronald Hollister, John Vandermusen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perry v. Chaudhary et al
as 0:2015cv03505
Plaintiff:
David Kevin Perry
Defendant:
Arit Chaudhary, Randi Gross and Greenville County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grayson Consulting, Inc. v. Total Eclipse International Lt
as 14-2053
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GRAYSON CONSULTING, INCORPORATED
Plaintiff:
KEVIN CAMPBELL, Chapter 7 Trustee
Defendant - Appellant:
TOTAL ECLIPSE INTERNATIONAL LTD
Defendant:
EVELYN CATHCART, CHARLES D. CATHCART CRUSADER TRUST, CATHCART INVESTMENT TRUST and others
Grayson Consulting, Inc, v. Clifford Lloyd
as 14-1997
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GRAYSON CONSULTING, INCORPORATED
Plaintiff:
KEVIN CAMPBELL, Chapter 7 Trustee
Defendant - Appellee:
CLIFFORD LLOYD, NIGEL HARLEY WOOD, TSUEI CONSULTANTS INCORPORATED and others
Defendant:
EVELYN CATHCART, CHARLES D. CATHCART CRUSADER TRUST, CATHCART INVESTMENT TRUST and others
Perry et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv16661
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Perry and Kevin Perry
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-1066
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - None:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-1640
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - None:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv02992
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334 Bankruptcy Appeal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
