Cases 1 - 10 of 69
Keith Davis v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2024cv00499
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Keith Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Davis et al v. Meander Inn, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00068
Plaintiff:
Ulla Davis and Keith Davis
Defendant:
Meander Inn, LLC a Virginia limited liability company doing business as The Inn and Tavern at Meander, Christopher Seek and Christina Seek
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Bailey et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv01175
Plaintiff:
DERIS DAVIS BAILEY, Keith Davis, ANDREA LYNN DAVIS FUERY and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Walter G. Belleza, UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND EMGERGENCY MEDICINE ASSOCIATES, P.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 U.S. Defendant
Bellamy v. Davis et al
as 3:2018cv00137
Plaintiff:
Marvin Bellamy
Defendant:
Keith Davis, Officer Smith and Officer Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mark Kersey v. Keith Davi
as 16-6751
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARK KERSEY
Respondent - Appellee:
KEITH DAVIS
Ryricka Custis v. Keith Davi
as 15-7533
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RYRICKA NIKITA CUSTIS
Defendant - Appellee:
KEITH DAVIS, Warden, Sussex I State Prison, S. EVANS, Records Department Head at Sussex I State Prison, M. WOODRUFF, Medical Department Head at Sussex I State Prison and others
Parker v. Davis et al
as 1:2015cv01192
Plaintiff:
Samson Parker
Defendant:
Keith Davis, J. Boone, D. B. Everett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lamar Jordan v. Keith Davi
as 15-7238
Petitioner - Appellant:
LAMAR JORDAN
Respondent - Appellee:
KEITH DAVIS, Warden
Brandon v. Davis
as 2:2015cv00261
Petitioner:
George A. Brandon
Respondent:
Keith Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hariston v. Ulep et al
as 1:2015cv00656
Plaintiff:
Stacey D. Hariston
Defendant:
Benjamin Ulep and Keith Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
