Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Dixon v. S.C. Department of Menal Health et al
as 3:2023cv05163
Plaintiff:
Dana LaShaune Dixon
Defendant:
S.C. Department of Mental Health, S.C. State Accident Fund and M. Stephen Stubley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Cox v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 6:2022cv01919
Plaintiff:
M Stephen Cox and Stephen M Cox
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151 Railway Labor Act
Stephens v. Warden McCaffrey
as 5:2022cv00077
Petitioner:
Korinna M. Stephens
Respondent:
Warden McCaffrey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Evanston Insurance Company v. Vapor World, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00112
Defendant:
Vapor World, LLC and David M. Stephens
Plaintiff:
Evanston Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Evanston Insurance Company v. Vapor World, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00111
Defendant:
Vapor World, LLC and David M. Stephens
Plaintiff:
Evanston Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stephens et al v. Pfizer Inc
as 2:2015cv02285
Plaintiff:
Jacquelyn M Stephens and Dennis G Stephens
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stephen et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv27916
Plaintiff:
Deborah M. Stephen and Bret E. Stephen
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stephens v. Pfizer Inc
as 2:2014cv00635
Plaintiff:
Annie M Stephens
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stephens et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv02619
Plaintiff:
Ola M. Stephens and Ray Walker
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stephens v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
as 7:2012cv00070
Plaintiff:
June M Stephens
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Group Long Term Disability Plan for Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
