Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Barker v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv02813
Plaintiff:
Charles Michael Barker
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Keith Seward v. Dr. James Riddle
as 14-1298
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEITH SEWARD
Defendant - Appellee:
DR. JAMES RIDDLE, CHAIRMAN MICHAEL BARKER, Academy Awards and PRESIDENT KEN HOWARD, Screen Actor's Guild
Seward v. Riddle
as 3:2012cv03103
Plaintiff:
Keith Seward
Defendant:
James Riddle, Michael Barker and Ken Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-1769
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Harold Dewhurst v. Century Aluminum Company
as 10-1759
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HAROLD DEWHURST, DAVID BRYAN, on behalf of themselves and all other persons similarly situated and UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER, MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO/CLC
Defendant - Appellee:
CENTURY ALUMINUM COMPANY, CENTURY ALUMINUM OF WEST VIRGINIA, INCORPORATED, CENTURY ALUMINUM MASTER WELFARE BENEFIT PLAN and others
Defendant:
USW LOCAL NO. 5668, LLOYD CONNER, JAMES KING and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Century Aluminum of West Virginia, Inc. v. United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO/CIC et al
as 2:2009cv01193
Plaintiff:
Century Aluminum of West Virginia, Inc., Century Aluminum of West Virginia, Inc. and Century Aluminum of West Virginia, Inc.
Defendant:
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO/CIC, USW Local No. 5668, Lloyd Conner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
