Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Anthony Harris v. Raven Mack
as 23-7063
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY L. HARRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
RAVEN DAWN MACK, Sergant at Lanesboro Correctional Institution, in her individual and official capacities originally named as Raven Dawn Mac, KEVIN C. WHITE, Lieutenant at Lanesboro Correctional Institution, in his individual and official capacities formerly known as FNU White, SANDRA J. COLLINS, Officer at Lanesboro Correctional Institution, in her individual and official capacities formerly known as FNU Collins and others
Hoover v. State of South Carolina
as 0:2022cv04498
Petitioner:
Mr. Billy G. Hoover
Respondent:
State of South Carolina and Director, Alvin S. Glenn Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Marks v. Turner et al
as 2:2022cv00009
Plaintiff:
Mr. Richard Marks and Richard A. Marks, Jr.
Defendant:
Mr. Billy Ray Turner and Atlantic OBX, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death
Rover Pipeline LLC v. Rover Tract No(s). WV-TY-SHC-018.000 et al
as 5:2019cv00093
Defendant:
Todd A. James, Any Unknown Owners, Mr. Gregory Rayburn and others
Plaintiff:
Rover Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Regina Hunter v. Nikki Haley
as 15-244
Petitioner:
REGINA M. HUNTER
Respondent:
THE HONORABLE NIKKI R. HALEY, Governor, State of South Carolina Government, MR. GARY A. MIXON, Administrator, Sumter County South Carolina Government, MRS. NAOMI D. SANDERS, Chairman D-1, Sumter County South Carolina Government and others
Regina Hunter v. Nikki Haley
as 15-1620
Plaintiff - Appellant:
REGINA M. HUNTER
Defendant - Appellee:
THE HONORABLE NIKKI R. HALEY, Governor, State of South Carolina Government, MR. GARY A. MIXON, Administrator, Sumter County South Carolina Government, MRS. NAOMI D. SANDERS, Chairman D-1, Sumter County South Carolina Government and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
