Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Bradley v. Mr. Burzinski et al
as 8:2023cv01336
Plaintiff:
Darryl Douglas Bradley, Jr
Defendant:
Mr. Burzinski, Mr. Kimbrell, Mr. Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Hamm v. South Carolina Department of Mental Health et al
as 9:2021cv03084
Plaintiff:
Michael E Hamm
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Mental Health, John Magill, Sexually Violent Predator Treatment Program Director and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Harrison et al
as 5:2018ct03179
Defendant:
A. Green, Mr. Sanders, Ms. Steinbeck and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ray Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mika'ya Shakur v. Henry Ponton
as 15-7252
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIKA'YA ALI SHAKUR
Defendant - Appellee:
HENRY PONTON, Warden, MRS. SANDERS, Hearing Officer and LT. MOICHECK, Lead Investigator
Myron Nunn v. N.C. Legislation
as 15-6902
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MYRON RODERICK NUNN
Defendant - Appellee:
N.C. LEGISLATION, FRANK PERRY, GEORGE T. SOLOMON and others
Nunn v. N.C. Legislation et al
as 5:2014ct03190
Plaintiff:
Myron Roderick Nunn
Defendant:
N.C. Legislation, Frank L. Perry, George T. Solomon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shakur v. Ponton et al
as 2:2013cv00406
Plaintiff:
Mika'ya Ali Shakur
Defendant:
Henry Ponton, Mrs. Sanders and Lt. Moicheck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Harrison et al
as 5:2010ct03208
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ray Harris
Defendant:
Donnie Harrison, Mr. Sanders and Maintenance Dept. Person in Charge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Fulmer et al
as 8:2009cv01044
Plaintiff:
Wyman Lee Williams, Jr
Defendant:
NFN Fulmer, NFN Holster, NFN Shoeler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martin v. Sanders
as 5:2008hc02021
Petitioner:
John Elwood Martin
Respondent:
Mr. Sanders
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
