Cases 1 - 10 of 105
Willie McKinnon v. Angela Talley
as 24-6485
Plaintiff:
WILLIE ORLANDO MCKINNON
Defendant:
ANGELA TALLEY, Montgomery County Correctional Facility Director, WARDEN SUSAN MALAGARI, DEPUTY WARDEN GILLIAM and others
Douse v. United States of America et al
as 5:2024cv00277
Plaintiff:
James Nathaniel Douse
Defendant:
United States of America and Greylock McKinnon Associates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
McKinnon v. Unknown
as 1:2024cv00821
Plaintiff:
John L. McKinnon
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00183
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cv Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
Willie McKinnon v. Corporal Fazel Malik
as 24-6140
Plaintiff:
WILLIE ORLANDO MCKINNON
Defendant:
CORPORAL FAZEL MALIK, SERGEANT ANTHONY HARRIS, CORPORAL DEREK IVEY and others
McKinnon v. Dotson
as 1:2024cv00169
Petitioner:
John McKinnon
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKinnon v. MCCF Director et al
as 1:2024cv00289
Plaintiff:
Willie Orlando McKinnon
Defendant:
MCCF Director, Warden Fredrick Abello, Deputy Warden Nash and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
McKinnon v. Elrich et al
as 1:2024cv00283
Plaintiff:
Willie Orlando McKinnon
Defendant:
County Executive Marc Elrich, Police Chief Marcus Jones and Det Brian Dyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01755
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Rosie Hopkins v. State of North Carolina
as 23-2008
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROSIE HOPKINS
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, PATHWAYS FOR PEOPLE, INC., JAMIE WEST, Owner, Pathways for People, Inc. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
