Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Woodson v. Hanheimer et al
as 7:2022cv00113
Plaintiff: Roosevelt Harry Woodson, Jr.
Defendant: Mr. Howard J. Manheimer and Mr. David L. Hensley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv01465
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bane v. United States of America, The We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv03371
Plaintiff: Ben W Bane
Defendant: United States of America, The, Mr Pacheco, Adam Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John M. Dickson, Jr. v. Judge Bryant L. Sugg We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-1852
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOHN M. DICKSON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee: JUDGE BRYANT LEE SUGG, Newport News Circuit Court 7th Judicial Court of Virginia As an "enterprise" for RICO purposes Acting as a person and member of a criminal enterprise Under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, FORMER JUDGE MR. HOWARD VINCENT CONWAY, JR., Of the Newport News Circuit Court Formerly of 7th Judicial Court of Virginia As an "enterprise" for RICO purposes Acting as a person and member of a criminal enterprise Under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrup, COMMONWEALTH'S ATTORNEY MR. THOMAS C. DANIEL, Commonwealth's Attorney's Office For the city of Newport News Acting as a person and member of a criminal enterprise Under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) and others
Dickson v. Sugg et al
as 4:2015cv00050
Plaintiff: John M. Dickson, Jr.
Defendant: Judge Bryant L. Sugg, Former Judge Mr. Howard Vincent Conway, Jr, Commonwealth's Attorney Mr. Thomas C. Daniel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nunn v. Keller et al
as 5:2010ct03211
Plaintiff: Myron Roderick Nunn
Defendant: Alvin W. Keller, Sr., Joseph B. Hall, Rickie Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?