Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Presidential Candidate Number P60005535 v. Maria Cherniavska We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 26-1200
Plaintiff: PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE NUMBER P60005535, a/k/a Ronald Satish Emrit and PRESIDENTIAL COMMITTEE/POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE/SEPARATE SEGREGATED FUND (SSF) NUMBER C00569897, d/b/a United Emrits of America
Defendant: MARIA CHERNIAVSKA, of Warsaw, Poland (Future First Lady of United States by 2028 in a parallel Universe), VOLODYMYR ZELENSKYY, President of Ukraine, ESTATE OF ALEXEI NAVALNY and others
Presidential Candidate Number P60005535 v. Maria Cherniavska We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 26-1151
Plaintiff: PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE NUMBER P60005535, a/k/a Ronald Satish Emrit and PRESIDENTIAL COMMITTEE/POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE/SEPARATE SEGREGATED FUND (SSF) NUMBER C00569897, d/b/a United Emrits of America
Defendant: MARIA CHERNIAVSKA, of Warsaw, Poland (Future First Lady of United States by 2028 in a Parallel Universe), VOLODYMYR ZELENSKYY, President of Ukraine, ALEXEI NAVALNY, Estate of and others
PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE NUMBER P60005535 et al v. CHERNIAVSKA OF WARSAW, POLAND
as 1:2026cv00085
Defendant: MARIA CHERNIAVSKA OF WARSAW, POLAND, VOLODYMYR ZELENSKYY, ESTATE OF ALEXEI NAVALNY and others
Plaintiff: PRESIDENTIAL COMMITTEE/POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE/SEPARATE SEGREGATED FUND (SSF) NUMBER C00569897 doing business as United Emrits of America and RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Presidential Candidate Number P60005535 et al v. Cherniavska et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2026cv00061
Plaintiff: Presidential Candidate Number P60005535, Ronald Satish Emrit and Presidential Committee/Political Action Committee/Separate Segregated Fund (SSF) Number C00569897 doing business as United Emrits of America
Defendant: Maria Cherniavska, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, Alexei Navalny and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Adair et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 2:2025cv11849
Plaintiff: Sharon Adair, Jody Alcantara, Angie Andrews and others
Defendant: The 3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Water Justice for Puerto Rico B.V. v. Moonshot Missions Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2024cv03446
Defendant: SENSUS USA INC., Moonshot Missions Inc., GEORGE HAWKINS and others
Plaintiff: WATER JUSTICE FOR PUERTO RICO B.V. and Miya Water Projects Netherlands B.V.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts
J. Robert van Faassen, LLM v. Greg Lindberg
as 24-1898
Respondent: NETHERLANDS INSURANCE HOLDINGS, INC., TRIER HOLDING B.V., GREG EVAN LINDBERG and others
Petitioner: WILLEM JAN M. VAN ANDEL, LLM, ELEONORA L. ZETTELER, LLM, in their capacity as insolvency practitioners in the insolvency of Nederlandsche Algemeene Maatschappij van Levensverzekering "CONSERVATRIX" N.V. and J. ROBERT VAN FAASSEN, LLM
VAN ANDEL et al v. LINDBERG et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00879
Petitioner: LLM WILLEM JAN M. VAN ANDEL, LLM ELEONORA l. ZETTELER, WILLEM JAN M. VAN ANDEL, LLM and others
Respondent: GREG EVAN LINDBERG, TRIER HOLDING B.V., NETHERLANDS INSURANCE HOLDINGS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0009 Motion to Confirm Arbitration
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00269
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Immigration: Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Miya Water Projects Netherlands B.V. et al v. Moonshot Missions Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2022mc00508
Petitioner: Miya Water Projects Netherlands B.V.
Respondent: Moonshot Missions Inc. and George Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?