Cases 1 - 10 of 2,578
Emden v. University of Baltimore School of Law et al
as 1:2024cv02744
Defendant:
John Doe 3, John Doe 1, University of Baltimore School of Law and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Emden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 c-6ed Discrimination in Education
Convisser et al v. Exxon Mobil Corporation et al
as 3:2024cv00072
Defendant:
Charles L. Pinnell, Keith Ford, Jane Doe, No. 1 and others
Petitioner:
Claude David Convisser
Plaintiff:
Claude David Convisser and POP Diesel Africa
Respondent:
Colette Marie Convisser, Martin Convisser and Martin Convisser Trust
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Lewis v. Clarke et al
as 7:2024cv00608
Defendant:
Correctional Officer John Doe #2, Correctional Officer Edwards, Nurse Jane Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Solomon Jordan Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv01520
Defendant:
John Doe
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv01522
Defendant:
John Doe
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv01523
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v John Doe
as 1:2024cv01524
Defendant:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 5:2024cv00491
Defendant:
John Doe
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 5:2024cv00492
Defendant:
John Doe
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 5:2024cv00493
Defendant:
John Doe
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
