Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Greg Givens v. John Longwell
as 23-1739
Plaintiff / Appellant: GREG GIVENS
Defendant / Appellee: JOHN LONGWELL and H. E. NEUMANN COMPANY
Montgomery Akers v. Jamie Conover
as 22-2254
Plaintiff / Appellant: MONTGOMERY CARL AKERS
Defendant / Appellee: JAMIE CONOVER, GUY PAGLI, JODI WAMBLER and others
Givens v. Longwell et al
as 5:2022cv00290
Plaintiff: Greg Givens
Defendant: John Longwell and H.E. Neumann Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Macher et al v. Netflix, Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2022cv00575
Plaintiff: Roland Macher and Slumlord Millionaire LLC
Defendant: Netflix, Inc, Reed Hastings, Marc Randolph and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Webster Neumann v. Mr. Wedelle
as 22-7076
Petitioner / Appellant: WEBSTER R. NEUMANN
Respondent / Appellee: MR. WEDELLE, Superintendent and STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Givens v. Longwell et al
as 5:2022cv00193
Plaintiff: Greg Givens doing business as American Enterprise Acquisitions, LLC
Defendant: John Longwell and H.E. Neumann Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Akers v. Conover et al
as 3:2022cv00109
Plaintiff: Montgomery Carl Akers
Defendant: Jamie Conover, Guy Pagli, Jodi Wambler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
NEUMANN v. WEDELLE et al
as 1:2021cv00892
Petitioner: WEBSTER R. NEUMANN
Respondent: WEDELLE, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and MR. WEDELLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
NEUMANN v. WENDELLE et al
as 1:2021cv00233
Petitioner: WEBSTER R. NEUMANN
Respondent: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA GUILFORD COUNTY and SUPERINTENDENT WENDELLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Neumann v. Wendelle et al
as 5:2021hc02073
Petitioner: Webster R. Neumann
Respondent: State of North Carolina and Superintendent Wendelle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?