Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Keith Cureton v. Officer Cherry
as 23-6328
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEITH LAMAR CURETON
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER CHERRY, SERGEANT LEWISE, OFFICER JACKSON and others
Butler v. Cherry et al
as 5:2022ct03446
Plaintiff:
Dominique Jamil Butler
Defendant:
Officer Cherry, Officer Demeri, Officer Whitaker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cureton v. Cherry et al
as 5:2022ct03318
Plaintiff:
Keith Cureton
Defendant:
Officer Cherry and Sergeant Lewise
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keith Cureton v. Officer Cherry
as 22-6893
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEITH LAMAR CURETON
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER CHERRY and SERGEANT LEWISE
Cureton v. Cherry
as 5:2021ct03372
Plaintiff:
Keith Cureton
Defendant:
Officer Cherry and Sergeant Lewise
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christopher Odom v. State of South Carolina
as 16-2121
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER A. ODOM
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, JASON KING, Public Defender, CHARLES PATRICK, Solicitor and others
Odom v. South Carolina, State of et al
as 5:2016cv02674
Plaintiff:
Christopher Odom
Defendant:
South Carolina, State of, Jason King, Charles Patrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christopher Odom v. Nikki Haley
as 15-7101
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER A. ODOM
Defendant - Appellee:
GOVERNOR NIKKI R. HALEY, MAYOR JOSEPH P. RILEY, JR., City of Charleston, MAYOR KEITH SUMNEY, North Charleston and others
Odom v. South Carolina, State of et al
as 5:2015cv01951
Plaintiff:
Christopher Odom
Defendant:
Nikki Haley, Joe Riley, Keith Sumney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jeffrey Pelzer v. Jail Officer Cherry
as 10-6217
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY PELZER
Defendant - Appellee:
OFFICER CHERRY, FNU, SGT. JANE DOE, Mecklenburg County Jail and JOHN DOE, D.A.R.T.
Movant - Appellee:
MECKLENBURG COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
