Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Pizarro Orta v. Creekstone Landscaping & Excavating LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01954
Plaintiff:
Ebsel Miguel Pizarro Orta
Defendant:
Creekstone Landscaping & Excavating, LLC, Caleb Z. Ditto, Polman Transfer, Inc. and others
Cross Defendant:
Russ Davis Wholesale Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Khrisrian Pizarro v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv03287
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Khrisrian Pizarro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Pizarro v. Gomez et al
as 1:2021cv00539
Respondent:
David Gomez and Maryland Attorney General
Petitioner:
Michael Pizarro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pizarro v. Saul
as 5:2021cv00046
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Gail Pizarro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
Willis v. GosgRove et al
as 8:2019cv00632
Defendant:
Mr. R. GosgRove, M. Sample and Mr. M. Gillespie
Plaintiff:
Pizarro Willis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Pizarro v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 5:2016cv01407
Plaintiff:
Sabino Pizarro
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Brown et al v. Transurban USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00494
Plaintiff:
Jo-Ann Brown , Mary Elise Pizarro and Michele Osborne
Defendant:
Transurban USA, Inc. , Transurban Drive, USA LLC , Capital Beltway Express, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Pizarro v. Warden
as 1:2015cv00617
Plaintiff:
Michael Pizarro
Defendant:
Warden, .
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pizarro v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv09146
Plaintiff:
Patricia Pizarro
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pizarro et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv23374
Plaintiff:
Myrna Pizarro and Miguel A. Pizarro, Sr.
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
