Cases 1 - 10 of 76
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00333
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Keeton v. Dudley et al
as 3:2024cv00321
Plaintiff:
Brooke Keeton
Defendant:
James Roane Dudley, Angela Epps, Brendan Farmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roane v. GRMC, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lee Roane
Defendant:
GRMC, Inc. and GRMC, Inc. doing business as Garrett Regional Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Fletcher v. Garland et al
as 3:2023cv00244
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Fletcher
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland, U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fletcher v. Garland et al
as 3:2023cv00230
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Fletcher
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland, United States Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roane v. General Assembly et al
as 1:2023cv00743
Plaintiff:
Melvin M. Roane
Defendant:
General Assembly and Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Roane v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00595
Plaintiff:
Everette Roane
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Vinson v. Roane
as 5:2023cv00092
Petitioner:
Adrian Vinson
Respondent:
Warden Roane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Holmes v. Roane
as 5:2023cv00062
Petitioner:
Seth Holmes
Respondent:
Warden Roane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Villarreal-Solis v. Roane
as 3:2023cv00002
Petitioner:
Hugo Villarreal-Solis
Defendant:
Acting Warden D. Roane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
