Cases 1 - 10 of 19
US v. Robert Lockhart
as 24-4113
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ROBERT BRADLEY LOCKHART
Robert Bradley v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv05968
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Bradley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Bradley v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00564
Plaintiff:
Robert Bradley
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
US v. Robert Lockhart
as 22-4376
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ROBERT BRADLEY LOCKHART
Amco Insurance Company et al v. Van Laningham and Associates, PLLC et al
as 5:2020cv00553
Plaintiff:
Amco Insurance Company and Depositors Insurance Company
Defendant:
Van Laningham and Associates, PLLC and Robert Bradley Van Laningham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scott v. Northam et al
as 1:2020cv01113
Defendant:
Pocahontas Correctional Center, Ralph Northam, USP Marion, IL. and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Bradley Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STEWART v. EMERGE ORTHO et al
as 1:2020cv00629
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, LT. FAIRCLOTH, EMERGE ORTHO and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BRADLEY STEWART
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STEWART v. EMERGE ORTHO et al
as 1:2020cv00505
Defendant:
EMERGE ORTHO, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY and MEDICAL STAFF
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BRADLEY STEWART
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Scott v. Marcus McClung
as 20-6284
Defendant / Appellee:
VIRGINIA STATE POLICE, DELEGATE TERRY GENE KILGORE, SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA REGIONAL JAIL AUTHORITY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT BRADLEY SCOTT
Scott v. Mcclung et al
as 7:2019cv00570
Defendant:
Judge Hines, Boyd, Judge Hamilton and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Bradley Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
