Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Oppenheimer v. Lee et al
as 5:2023cv00610
Defendant:
Perklee, Inc., Jeremy S Lee, The Golf Critique, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
David Gordon Oppenheimer
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Herrera v. Kwang Lee Construction, Inc. et al
as 8:2023cv02742
Plaintiff:
Jose Antonio Herrera
Defendant:
Kwang Lee Construction, Inc. and Myung S. Lee
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2021cv00223
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Victoria Transcultural Clinical Center, VTCC, LLC et al v. Lee et al
as 1:2020cv00855
Defendant:
M.D. Jennifer S. Lee, The Virginia Department of Medical Assistance Services and Jennifer S. Lee
Plaintiff:
Esq. Jennifer A. Brust, Samuel J. Banks and Victoria Transcultural Clinical Center, VTCC, LLC
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
American Fidelity Assurance Company v. Moore et al
as 7:2019cv00035
Defendant:
Ralph S. Lee II, Mary Ann Moore Masters, Doris McRae Moore and others
Plaintiff:
American Fidelity Assurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv02520
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Lee v. New Rue 21 LLC
as 5:2018cv01472
Plaintiff:
Ebony S Lee
Defendant:
New Rue 21 LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Park v Lee et al
as 1:2018cv01258
Plaintiff:
Young Dol Park
Defendant:
Jong Hwa Lee, Kye S. Lee and HKGDJ Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tyrone Ragland v. S. Lee
as 16-7688
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TYRONE RAGLAND
Defendant - Appellee:
S. LEE, Correctional Officer, JEFFREY N. DILLMAN, Warden and CHARLENE DAVIS, Asst. for Wendy Hobbs Regional Administrator
Lee v. USA - 2255
as 1:2016cv00966
Petitioner:
Colette S. Lee
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
