Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Barrett v. Daly
as 1:2022cv02194
Plaintiff:
Scott P. Barrett
Defendant:
Michael A. Daly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00363
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Presley et al v. JT International Distributors, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01185
Plaintiff:
Scott P Presley and Hilary Presley
Defendant:
JT International Distributors, Inc. and Chick Harness & Supply, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
John Lamm v. Branch Banking & Trust Company
as 16-1970
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN RICHARD LAMM
Defendant - Appellee:
BRANCH BANKING & TRUST COMPANY and SCOTT P. EVANS
Defendant:
MICHAEL P. SOUTHERN and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Campbell v. Dillman et al
as 1:2016cv01059
Plaintiff:
Scott P. Campbell
Defendant:
Jeffrey Dillman, D. Diming and W. Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lamm v. Branch Banking and Trust Company, et al
as 4:2014cv00219
Plaintiff:
John Richard Lamm
Defendant:
Branch Banking and Trust Company, Scott P. Evans, Michael P. Southern and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Goodman et al v. Boston Scientific Corp.
as 2:2014cv26725
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Goodman and Scott P. Goodman
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sells et al v. Loudoun County, Virginia et al
as 1:2014cv00092
Plaintiff:
Scott P. Sells and Savannah Family Institute
Defendant:
Loudoun County, Virginia and John P. Walker
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Goodman et al v. Boston Scientific Corp. et al
as 2:2013cv32896
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Goodman and Scott P. Goodman
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corp. , Secant Medical, Secant Medical, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00088
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
